Potential for a transition from standard to phantom dark energy in the FLRW cosmology: A dynamical systems analysis

Authors

  • Vitaly D. Vertogradov Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Saint Peterburg Branch of Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Center for Theoretical Physics, Khazar University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-7696
  • Ulyana V. Yamaltdinova Saint Peterburg Branch of Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8451-0950

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-153X-2026-7-1-36-44

Keywords:

cosmology, dark energy, phantom energy, FLRW model, dynamical systems, equation of state

Abstract

Modern cosmology is based on the ΛCDM model, in which the Universe’s accelerated expansion is driven by dark energy with equation of state w = –1. While ΛCDM agrees well with observational data — from CMB anisotropies to large-scale structure — both theoretical considerations and emerging observations suggest that dark energy may be dynamical, with w(z) that evolves over time. A scenario of particular interest is a potential transition from standard dark energy (w ≥ –1) to phantom energy (w < –1), which violates the strong energy condition and may lead to a ‘Big Rip’. Planck data (Aghanim et al. 2020) confirm that, as of today, dark energy dominates (ΩDE ≈ 0.685) and w is consistent with –1; however, combined analyses (Planck + BAO + supernovae) permit slight deviations into the phantom regime (w ≈ –1.03 ± 0.03). Though marginal, this possibility motivates the study of models where w(z) crosses the w = –1 barrier. Moreover, recent JWST observations reveal unexpectedly massive galaxies at z > 10, challenging ΛCDM predictions of structure formation and hinting at modified expansion histories that may involve evolving — or phantom — dark energy. This work investigates whether phantom energy can act as a future attractor in a flat FLRW cosmology. Using autonomous dynamical systems, we analyse the evolution of density parameters Ωi(z) and w(z) in a model that permits crossing the w = –1 divide.

References

Adler, R. J., Casey, B. and Jacob, O. C. (1995) Vacuum Catastrophe: An Elementary Exposition of the Cosmological Constant problem. American Journal of Physics, 63, 620-626. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17850 (In English)

Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdownet, M. et al. (2020) Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 (In English)

Ashmita, R., Kinjal, B., Prasanta, K. D. (2024) Constructing viable interacting dark matter and dark energy models: a dynamical systems approach. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024 (034), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/034 (In English)

Barreiro, T., Copeland, E. J., Nunes, N. J. (2000) Quintessence model with a non-minimal coupling to dark matter. Physical Review D, 61, 12, article 127301. (In English)

Blau, M. (2024) Lecture notes on General Relativity. Bern: Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics Publ., 990 p. (In English)

Boehmer, C. G., Chan, N. (2017) Dynamical Systems in Cosmology. In: Dynamical and Complex Systems. Singapore: World Scientific Publ., pp. 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781786341044_0004 (In English)

Boehmer, C. G., Chan, N., Lazkoz, R. (2012) Dynamics of dark energy models and centre manifolds. Physics Letters B, 714 (1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.064 (In English)

Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N. (2009) A model of vacuum energy transition: slow-roll to quintessence. Physics Letters B, 672 (3), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.01.044 (In English)

Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., Xia, J.-Q. (2010) Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. Physics Reports, 493 (1), 1– 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 (In English)

Carroll, S. M. (2001) The cosmological constant. Living Reviews in Relativity, 4, article 1. (In English)

Coley, A. A. (2003) Dynamical Systems and Cosmology. Dordrecht: Springer, 264 p. (In English)

Copeland, E. J., Sami, M., Tsujikawa, S. (2006) Dynamics of dark energy. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 15 (11), 1753–1936. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021827180600942X (In English)

Dungan, R., Prosper, H. B. (2011) Cosmological parameter estimation using supernova data. American Journal of Physics, 79 (1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0909.5416 (In English)

Feng, B., Wang, X., Zhang, X. (2005) Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova. Physics Letters B, 607 (1–2), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071 (In English)

Garcia-Salcedo, R., Gonzalez, T., Quiros, I., Thompson-Montero, M. (2013) Phantom dark energy as the driver of the universe’s cosmic history. Physical Review D, 88 (4), article 043008. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.043008 (In English)

Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution. Physics Reports, 692, 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 (In English)

Nunes, A., Mimoso, J. P. (2000) Cosmological scaling solutions and multiple dark matter species. Physics Letters B, 488 (5–6), 423–427. (In English)

Peebles, P. J. E., Ratra, B. (2003) The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75 (2), 559–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 (In English)

Perko, L. (2001) Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. New York: Springer, 553 p. (In English)

Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P. et al. (1998) Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astronomical Journal, 116 (3), 1009–1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499 (In English)

Weinberg, S. (1989) The cosmological constant problem. Reviews of Modern Physics, 61 (1), 1–23. (In English)

Published

30.03.2026

Issue

Section

Theoretical Physics